Iran has refuted claims that a significant deal with the United States is on the verge of completion, pointing out that several crucial issues remain unresolved despite some advancements in negotiations. Esmail Baghaei, the Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson, stated that while there has been mutual understanding on numerous points, asserting that a final agreement is imminent would be premature. He attributed the slow progress to conflicting statements from Washington and interference from Israel.
A primary topic in these discussions is the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping. Iran clarified its stance by stating that it does not intend to impose tolls on passing vessels. However, it may levy fees for services related to navigation and environmental protection, in collaboration with Oman. Additionally, Iran emphasized that any agreement should encompass a ceasefire in Lebanon and the lifting of restrictions on Iranian ports and shipping activities.
In response, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged the ongoing discussions, describing the current proposal as significant. The proposed framework reportedly includes a 30-day period following a ceasefire, during which Iran would be responsible for removing mines from the Strait of Hormuz to restore full maritime access. Concurrently, the US military confirmed conducting strikes in southern Iran, targeting missile launch sites and boats believed to be preparing to lay mines. Washington justified these actions as self-defense while continuing to support ceasefire initiatives.
US President Donald Trump remarked that the final agreement must be “great and meaningful,” otherwise, no deal would be reached. He also urged several Middle Eastern nations to join the Abraham Accords and normalize relations with Israel, though regional leaders reportedly showed limited interest. Meanwhile, unresolved matters include Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Tehran has expressed a willingness to temporarily reduce enrichment levels but rejected demands to transfer its uranium stockpile abroad. Iran is also seeking the release of billions of dollars in frozen assets held overseas.
Iranian officials argue that internal political divisions within the US, including criticism from Congress and parts of the Republican Party, are exerting pressure on the White House and further complicating negotiations. Notably, the proposed agreement does not address Iran’s ballistic missile program or its support for regional armed groups, which makes it less comprehensive than previous US demands.